Saturday 15 March 2014

Dillon's Laws of Attraction



                When I was single, I often spent my waking hours developing theories as to why people were attracted to other people (and maybe why no one was attracted to me...). I took one Psychology class and I figured I was qualified to delve deep into the human brain and pretend that Freud, Jung, and I suppose Darwin had nothing on me! But, obviously, I am not nearly as qualified and going on the theme of human attraction and interaction this week (with a bit of sciency-ness), I thought I would share some of my ideas... WITHOUT evidence to back up my theories! *gasp*
Disclaimer: These theories are in no way meant to be offensive to anyone. They were merely acts of justification, and they definitely require further research and revision. Please excuse my ambiguity in these theories too. 

THEORY #1:
                You know how many animals on our planet have mating rituals and mechanisms? For example, many birds have feathers that are used to attract mates and whoever has the best display wins the mate. Well, it is my belief that humans have variations of these displays too, and that may be obvious but let me explain. Humans have hair on our heads to keep our heads warm since it is one of the places where we lose the most heat in our bodies. But, why do we feel the need to dress it up and curl it, cut it, comb it, and spend so much time worrying about it? Well, is it not to essentially attract a potential mate? People with healthy, beautiful hair are often sought after more so than those who do not necessarily take care of it. The same goes for men’s facial hair. I also read somewhere that men who can grow fuller facial hair are generally more fertile, so maybe females who find it attractive really attribute that to the fact that they will make better and more babies as a primitive need to keep our species alive. No offense ladies – I’m not saying you’re primitive creatures. But, we must as humans still have some sort of natural tendencies left... right? This can also go for eye colour, the use of make-up (obviously), wearing accessories and clothes, how we flirt, etc etc. All of these can be compared to mating rituals all sorts of different animals do. Look it up! See if you know any people who do things similar to what you find in animals! It is actually quite funny.

THEORY #2:
                Now, this one a lot of people may take offensively, but I see it as a wonderful evolution of the human race. We are becoming unhealthily over-populated and I often hear people joke that “we need another plague” in order to knock down our population a bit. It’s obvious that we are too many; the world is dying because of us. Some countries even have population control methods (I think. This is where I need more research). But, since there is a rise in the LGBT population – do you think this is a more humane way of population control than killing people off or having abortions? I mean, we’re controlling population by endorsing love between people that naturally cannot reproduce! But, the more people we have on our planet, the more there will be people who identify as homosexual, so there is a simple correlation in that sense; but doesn’t it make sense that our advanced brains devise ways in which we can slow down our population growth by not dying? Because we are at the top of the food chain – nothing else can do that except for disease and natural disasters, and we seem to be too smart for those to take effect in a large way. And please don’t take this as me comparing homosexuality to a plague, it is nothing of the sort.

THEORY #3:
                Love in itself is a beautiful concept. Two people find a sparkle in each other’s eyes and then attempt at a future together. I have recently come to a thought that love may be a human defense mechanism. A lot of us believe that love is one of the main answers to the big questions of life. Love is actually a chemical reaction in our brains that allows us to become emotionally, mentally, spiritually, and physically attached to another individual. But then there is also familial love, where you have this undying attachment to those who share the same blood as you. But why do we have these attachments? Is it simply because we love them? Or are these chemical reactions in our brains ways that we can ensure our own safety from the dangers of the world? After all, multiple heads are better than one, so chances of survival when there are more people in your group (I almost said herd...) are a lot better. So, you reproduce within these groups and then you have dependents in this group, but they grow to offer new knowledge and talents within the group to offer more unique ways of survival, and thus keeping the human population alive. Though, my previous theory debunks the need for our population's survival – since there are WAY too many on earth right now anyway – but as I said before too, we must still have some natural inhibitions left in our brains, I mean we still have flight and fight responses and adrenaline responses to dangerous situations. Why can’t we consider love an ancient form of defense? I think there is something poetic about that.

In conclusion, I don’t think that humans are that far from our animal neighbors as we like to think we are, and that we have carried on these primitive intuitions through the millennia which are strong and effective mechanisms. This is proven by the mass amounts of people on our Earth today. There may be further arguments that we have accumulated these mechanisms through the centuries from the animals that we observe, but that is a totally different post for another time. But there's food for thought!

Also if my dad were to have written this blog he would have attributed all of these things to aliens. 
 

Until next time,

Dillon

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments system